GERMANY: Basic Income initiatives in Europe in the leading magazine “Der Spiegel”

daniel.web_-500x333

Daniel Häni. Credit to: The Establishment.

Within the past two months, the well-known German magazine Der Spiegel has published two comprehensive articles about Basic Income.

The December 25th edition of Der Spiegel contains an article that discusses models of Basic Income and the current popular initiative in Switzerland, as well as some calculations on the cost of introducing it in Germany, Finland and Switzerland.

The author, Florian Diekmann, distinguishes between two basic formats: a “humanistic” approach that lets people make a free choice on the base of a real income guarantee, and a “neoliberal“ model that would get rid of a large part of the traditional social security payments as well as the social bureaucracy. The Swiss proposal is presented as an example of the “humanistic” model, and the Finnish pilot in its current design as the “neoliberal” model. For Germany, following the Swiss model would result in a Basic Income of €1,500 per month/person and following the Finnish model €664 per month/person. (Currently, most German supporters of the Basic Income talk about a BI of approximately €1,000 per month/person.) All in all, Basic Income would cost Germany €1.2 trillion per year under the Swiss model, €530 billion under the Finnish model and about €800 billion for the level proposed by the German BI supporters. In comparison, the current annual amount of social expenditures in Germany is about €850 billion.

Diekmann also compares the proposed amounts of a Basic Income to the level of all incomes in Germany for the year 2011. For the Swiss model, the BI corresponds to nearly two thirds of all private incomes; for the Finnish model, in contrast, it is barely 30%.

On January 28th, Der Spiegel published an in-depth interview with Daniel Häni and Philip Kovce, the authors of the book Was fehlt, wenn alles da ist? (What’s missing if everything is there?). (See the book review on this webpage as of November 15th, 2015)

Philip Kovce

Philip Kovce

In the interview, Häni and Kovce emphasise that one of the core motivations for a Basic Income is the social transformation from alienated work into intrinsically motivated, freely chosen activities. They believe that, if provided a guaranteed, unconditional Basic Income, most people would continue to be active and work to create value, albeit on a radically different fundament. To achieve such a change, Häni and Kovce acknowledge that a long process will be necessary, but they stress that this process is one which has been initiated already, due to recent changes in working conditions and the evolution of the economy in the second, third and now the fourth industrial revolutions. Nobody can seriously expect the return to full employment under the conditions and in the form we experienced in the 1970s.

More information at:

Language: German

Zeit Online, “Digital revolution: The boss of Deutsche Telekom is in favour of a Basic Income [Digitale Revolution: Telekom-Chef Höttges für bedingungsloses Grundeinkommen]“, December 29th 2015

Giovanni di Lorenzo, “The difference between humans and computers will be lifted soon [Der Unterschied zwischen Mensch und Computer wird in Kürze aufgehoben sein]“, January 14th 2016

Carsten Knop, “A Basic Income is helpful for everybody [Ein Grundeinkommen hilft allen]“, Frankfurter Allgemeine, January 21st 2016

About Albert Joerimann

Albert Joerimann has written 5 articles.

Born in 1955, latest professional activities: translations, B.I. activist since 2003

2 comments

  • Daniel

    That’s the thing, really. Reality is about to outpace legislation, so we have to think of a way to adapt our social systems to it. Full employment with our current definition of work in mind will be impossible to achieve in the future. Unfortunately, our politicians only think ahead as far as their next election….

  • Russ morris

    One day a basic income will just be done, and added to the economic equation. then, we will learn how to behave in a way which is relative to “what is best for all life”.
    I did not find a memory of teachings for this as I was growing up. Now I am learning. It is fascinating.
    It is possible because I receive a basic income of free rent from my brother who is a developer. And that has given me time to investigate “what is happening”. Which led to the study of basic income and monetary reform. The American monetary institute
    💜💰🎩🍻⛵️🌊🏝🚀🌠😎

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *